Why is it that the "Best Restaurant" articles usually are accompanied by a picture of a dish that can't be postitively identified as food?
What makes the restaurant judges think that an artfully arranged plate of herbs and flowers or a stack of foodstuffs with an artful drizzle of balsamic sauce should be shown as an example of what is served in a good restaurant?
Perhaps Noma is the best restaurant, I'm not the one to ask. But, as an example, show me a plate of meat and sides, or pasta, or a piece of glistening grilled fish.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment